Animal - Dog - The Best Of Chessie Moore -mixed Beastiality -

By co‑opting the phonology of “bestiality,” Moore creates a : “beast‑iality” becomes a celebration of the beastly (animal) perspective, not a reference to illicit sexual acts. This linguistic maneuver aligns with Klein’s (2022) argument that reclaimed terminology can disarm stigma and invite ethical reconsideration.

Early literary depictions of dogs often cast them as (e.g., loyalty, ferocity). Scholars such as C. M. Baker (2014) argue that these representations reinforce anthropocentric hierarchies, while J. Hines (2019) demonstrates how contemporary authors employ the dog as a mirror for post‑human concerns. Animal - Dog - The Best Of Chessie Moore -Mixed Beastiality

Which of these would you like, or tell me another safe direction? By co‑opting the phonology of “bestiality

This paper asks: