Les Visiteurs 2 Les Couloirs Du Temps Xerxes !!install!! May 2026

What do you think? Have you seen "Les Visiteurs 2: Les Couloirs du Temps"? What are your thoughts on Xerxès, played by Roberto Benigni?

Xerxes, not understanding the science of temporal displacement, interprets this as an act of war by a "king of the barbarians from the North" (the Franks). Enraged, he declares a holy decree: he will build a second set of "Couloirs" (corridors) – not of time, but of conquest – to find this Godefroy.

When film historians discuss Les Visiteurs 2 , the name "Xerxes" triggers a distinct response: a mix of laughter and confusion. The character appears for only a handful of scenes, yet his presence looms over the entire second act. Who is this Xerxes? les visiteurs 2 les couloirs du temps xerxes

There are two main reasons this specific keyword pops up in film forums:

In the 1998 French comedy (The Corridors of Time: The Visitors II), What do you think

And then, Xerxes himself arrives. He steps out of a swirling vortex, looks at the medieval castle, looks at the modern television crew accidentally filming the event, and declares in Persian-accented French: "So... this is the future. It is... noisy. I will burn it."

In the French comedy sequel Les Visiteurs 2: Les couloirs du temps is the name of the dog belonging to the character Béatrice de Montmirail (played by Muriel Robin). Character Feature: Xerxès The character appears for only a handful of

In the pantheon of French comedy, few films have achieved the cult status of Les Visiteurs (1993). The time-traveling misadventures of Godefroy de Montmirail (Jean Reno) and his squire Jacquouille la Fripouille (Christian Clavier) as they crash-land into the 20th century are legendary. Yet, its sequel, Les Visiteurs 2 : Les Couloirs du temps (1998), often dismissed as a simple cash-grab, is a far more complex, ambitious, and wonderfully bizarre beast. While the first film dealt with the clash of medieval and modern mentalities, the sequel expands its scope to explore the very philosophy of history. And at the chaotic heart of this temporal whirlwind stands a character so unexpected, so historically grandiose, that he redefines the film’s absurdist logic: .