The report uses language suggesting some narrators transmitted both correct and deviated material. This is crucial when you see a reliable thiqah narrating a singular odd hadith with a Fathi slant. The report advises: examine whether the oddity appears only after the split (116/117 AH) or before.
Tell me which edition (language, publisher, or a link) you have in mind or want me to use, and I’ll extract and analyze the specific content of entry/report 176 (name, assessment, chain connections, and cross-references). Rijal Al Kashi Report 176