Tabaqat Al Kubra. Vol. 3 Pg. 269 H. 3714 _top_

The battle was a test of faith and loyalty for the Muslims, as they faced a stronger and more experienced enemy. The Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) and his Companions displayed extraordinary courage and resilience in the face of adversity. Although the Muslims suffered a setback, they ultimately emerged victorious, having inflicted significant casualties on the Quraysh.

Do not cite this narration as “Ibn Sa‘d said…” to prove anything religiously binding. Instead, cite the sahih versions from Bukhari or Muslim. If you need to reference Ibn Sa‘d for historical completeness, always add a disclaimer: “With a very weak chain containing al-Waqidi, but the meaning is corroborated by authentic hadith.” tabaqat al kubra. vol. 3 pg. 269 h. 3714

: Scholars like Aisha Bewley have translated this volume, making these detailed 9th-century accounts accessible for modern historical research. The battle was a test of faith and

Unfortunately, I don't have direct access to the specific volume and page you mentioned (Vol. 3, pg. 269, H. 3714). However, I can try to provide you with a general overview of the book and its contents. Do not cite this narration as “Ibn Sa‘d

At first glance, Tabaqat al-Kubra, vol. 3, pg. 269, h. 3714 appears to be a dry, archival citation. But for those who learn its language, it becomes a living window. On that page, we see a Basran judge (‘Abdullah ibn ‘Utbah) sitting in Medina with ‘A’ishah, memorizing the quiet rhythm of the Prophet’s night vigil. We see Ibn Sa‘d, in 9th-century Baghdad, diligently recording that memory despite his reliance on the controversial al-Waqidi. And we see the plague’s shadow—Rajab of 120 AH—claiming a generation of transmitters.

A reliable Tabi‘i (follower), a judge in Mecca, known as a faqih and ascetic. He is trustworthy ( thiqah ). Imam al-Dhahabi praises him.